crt

We are all caught up in one another, Scott Lauria Morgensen asserts, we who live in settler societies, and our interrelationships inform all that these societies touch. Native people live in relation to all non-Natives amid the ongoing power relations of settler colonialism, despite never losing inherent claims to sovereignty as indigenous peoples. Explaining how relational distinctions of “Native” and “settler” define the status of being “queer,” Spaces between Us argues that modern queer subjects emerged among Natives and non-Natives by engaging the meaningful difference indigeneity makes within a settler society.
Morgensen’s analysis exposes white settler colonialism as a primary condition for the development of modern queer politics in the United States. Bringing together historical and ethnographic cases, he shows how U.S. queer projects became non-Native and normatively white by comparatively examining the historical activism and critical theory of Native queer and Two-Spirit people.
Presenting a “biopolitics of settler colonialism”—in which the imagined disappearance of indigeneity and sustained subjugation of all racialized peoples ensures a progressive future for white settlers—Spaces between Us newly demonstrates the interdependence of nation, race, gender, and sexuality and offers opportunities for resistance in the United States. 
(via Spaces between Us — University of Minnesota Press)

We are all caught up in one another, Scott Lauria Morgensen asserts, we who live in settler societies, and our interrelationships inform all that these societies touch. Native people live in relation to all non-Natives amid the ongoing power relations of settler colonialism, despite never losing inherent claims to sovereignty as indigenous peoples. Explaining how relational distinctions of “Native” and “settler” define the status of being “queer,” Spaces between Us argues that modern queer subjects emerged among Natives and non-Natives by engaging the meaningful difference indigeneity makes within a settler society.

Morgensen’s analysis exposes white settler colonialism as a primary condition for the development of modern queer politics in the United States. Bringing together historical and ethnographic cases, he shows how U.S. queer projects became non-Native and normatively white by comparatively examining the historical activism and critical theory of Native queer and Two-Spirit people.

Presenting a “biopolitics of settler colonialism”—in which the imagined disappearance of indigeneity and sustained subjugation of all racialized peoples ensures a progressive future for white settlers—Spaces between Us newly demonstrates the interdependence of nation, race, gender, and sexuality and offers opportunities for resistance in the United States.

(via Spaces between Us — University of Minnesota Press)

  1. lilslumberprince reblogged this from sassyfrasscircus
  2. flownflux reblogged this from slutgarden
  3. slutgarden reblogged this from garconniere
  4. thunderhorsevintage reblogged this from garconniere
  5. schizophrengeek reblogged this from llibre
  6. llibre reblogged this from garconniere and added:
    Scott Lauria Morgensen, Spaces Between Us
  7. thededucer reblogged this from sassyfrasscircus
  8. catsluck reblogged this from sassyfrasscircus
  9. sassyfrasscircus reblogged this from garconniere and added:
    Can’t wait to read this.
  10. msnovember reblogged this from garconniere and added:
    This looks amazing. I’m going to request it at the library, but I don’t hold high hopes they’ll have/get it.
  11. xicanaboi reblogged this from curate
  12. curate posted this